Megachurch (discussion) - Revision history

Graham grove: Blanked the page

2018-04-20T14:06:56Z

Blanked the page

Free from HRWiki: rv/v

2009-09-05T18:02:31Z

rv/v

Pope Urban VI: reverting vandalism

2009-05-21T22:16:14Z

reverting vandalism

Bob Larson: with love from ebaums

2009-05-21T22:16:12Z

with love from ebaums

Graham grove at 18:15, 8 August 2008

2008-08-08T18:15:11Z

Graham grove at 09:50, 3 October 2007

2007-10-03T09:50:19Z

Graham grove at 09:49, 3 October 2007

2007-10-03T09:49:59Z

Graham grove at 09:49, 3 October 2007

2007-10-03T09:49:46Z

New page

It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?! --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)

----

''Add opinion or comment here''

{{returnto}} [[Megachurch]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 20 April 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?!
−	~~{{rightbox \| text=[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)}}~~

−	~~----~~
−
−	~~''Add short opinion or comment here''~~
−
−	~~{{returnto}} [[Megachurch]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 5 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS~~	+	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?!
		+	{{rightbox \| text=[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)}}
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	''Add short opinion or comment here''
		+
		+	{{returnto}} [[Megachurch]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~LOL INTERNET~~	+	WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?!	+	LOL INTERNET
−	~~{{rightbox \| text=[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)}}~~
−
−	~~----~~
−
−	~~''Add short opinion or comment here''~~
−
−	~~{{returnto}} [[Megachurch]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 8 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?! --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)	+	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?!
		+	{{rightbox \| text=[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)}}

	----		----

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 3 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?! --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)	+	It's easy to be negative about megachurches if you don't go to one, and I don't. I guess I don't want to fall into that trap of always being negative though. If the motives behind leaders and members of a megachurch are to do with financial gain or political influence or fame and popularity, then clearly there is a real problem - like there was with many of the Pharisees in Jesus' day. But in cases where the growth represents God's work and the focus is on Jesus (and not the pastor), and the underlying motive of the leaders is faithfulness to God with pure hearts, then why should I be critical?! --[[User:Graham grove\|Graham grove]] 04:49, 3 October 2007 (EST)

	----		----

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ----
-''Add opinion or comment here''
+''Add short opinion or comment here''
 {{returnto}} [[Megachurch]]