392
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
counter coutner riposte
* I'd be interested to hear a little further about your thinking for linking in the Bible. I'm suggesting for example, if the word "Abraham" appears in the text, that it links to [[Abraham]]; "Baal" would link to [[Baal]]; "Israel" might link to [[Ancient Israel and Judah]] if it was appropriate to the context and so on. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 10:51, 23 July 2008 (PDT)
* Not sure about where the footnote would be seen. Perhaps only on the original page. What do you think? --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 10:53, 23 July 2008 (PDT)
::::: Aq
* I don't disagree that sometimes it's plain as day, but just to take you last one as an example: Dispensationalism says that Ancient Israel '''''is''''' Modern Israel: you're deciding they are not by having two pages and linking to one over the other. Or, somewhere you and I might disagree, what is "the world" in [[John 3:16]]? The planet? The people? Which people? The elect? Who gets to decide which link is appropriate when there isn't just one page to which one can link?
* Footnotes about textual variations are so erudite and esoteric, that I can't imagine any but the most lofty of scholars wanting to input that resolution of detail into a wiki. Since, however, [http://unbound.biola.edu Unbound]'s free texts provide it, it would seem best in by judgment to include it on the Greek page and nowhere else. --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 11:01, 23 July 2008 (PDT)
