Open main menu

Changes

User:Theologian/sandbox2

1,457 bytes added, 03:00, 20 October 2008
no edit summary
Here is an interesting article for those who are interested in creating an article which gets a lot of internet traffic: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/a-little-piece-of-the-google-algorithm-revealed
http://proof.sitesell.com/victory4.html
 
==Article length==
There does seem to be debate on how long an article can be and still rank well. The gentleman who trained me states you should not go over 70K for an article.
 
Generally speaking it is harder to rank well for very short stubby articles.
 
However, I do rank well for two very competitive searches on social issues and my articles take throw everything but the kitchen sink at them approach. So the articles are long in length. I also well cite my material and pick good sources. Those articles took a lot of work to do though. I also am not sure how many people read much of the longest of those articles I created as I do not have the data as I hosted the material at a website I do not own. In general people do hava a habit of skimming and reading internet articles by reading the sections they are interested in. However, the articles in question do get a lot of clicks on the articlea as I have access to the webpage counters. By the way, one of the reasons I took a throw everything at them but the kitchen sink approach is I wanted to create a one stop shopping approach as far as the relevant information plus I figured a throw everything at them but the kitchen sink approach would get a lot of publicity and the article would rank high at the search engines. At the time I wrote those articles my knowledge of search engine optimization was more limited but I did have good research skills compared to most people.
==A word of warning==
863
edits