Difference between revisions of "Penal substitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Graham grove (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ''Synopsis:'' The Penal-Substitution Theory of the [[atonement]] maintains that [[Christ]] died on the cross as a substitute for [[sinner]]s. [[God]] imputed the guilt of our [[sin]]s to Christ, and he, in our place, bore the punishment that we deserve. This was a full payment for sins, which satisfied both the wrath and the righteousness of God, so that He could [[forgive]] sinners without compromising His own [[holy]] standard. | |
− | {{ | + | __TOC__ |
+ | {{topics}} | ||
{{opinions}} | {{opinions}} | ||
* [[Penal substitution (R.H.)]] | * [[Penal substitution (R.H.)]] | ||
− | + | ==Main article== | |
− | + | ==Quotes== | |
− | * [http://www.theopedia.com/Penal_substitution_theory_of_the_atonement Theopedia - | + | |
+ | ==Links== | ||
+ | * [http://www.theopedia.com/Penal_substitution_theory_of_the_atonement Theopedia - Penal substitutionary theory of the atonement] | ||
{{returnto}} [[Atonement]] | {{returnto}} [[Atonement]] |
Revision as of 09:49, 8 September 2007
Synopsis: The Penal-Substitution Theory of the atonement maintains that Christ died on the cross as a substitute for sinners. God imputed the guilt of our sins to Christ, and he, in our place, bore the punishment that we deserve. This was a full payment for sins, which satisfied both the wrath and the righteousness of God, so that He could forgive sinners without compromising His own holy standard.
Contents
Related topics
Comments, Personal Articles, Studies and Sermons
Penal substitution (discussion) (For short comments and opinions)
Main article
Quotes
Links
Return to Atonement