Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Theologian/sandbox2

653 bytes added, 14:36, 16 February 2009
no edit summary
So what are the implications of this phenomena from a SEO point of view? The implications are that if you have an accurate hard hitting article the opponents of your article will likely create inbound links to your webpage far more rabidly and abundantly. After this occurs, you simply get high [http://www.googlearticles.com/google-search/google-pagerank-defined/ Google Pagerank] website articles that agree with you on the topic to link to your webpage (this is covered more in the link building section of this resource).
 
Another tip is if you are writing against X in an article, then it is a good idea to post in the top forums and blogs of X's supporters. Google does look at the topical relevance of the inbound links to an article in terms of getting top rankings so if you want to rank high for X then posting in Y's supporters who are against X will be less effective. If your privacy is a concern when it comes to posting in X's forums and blogs then I suggest using free or for pay IP blocking software solutions like [http://www.anonymizer.com/ Anonymizer], [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2464 Foxyproxy], and [http://www.torproject.org/ Tor].
 
==How do People Evaluate a Website's Credibility? ==
Credibility is important for both non-profit and for profit websites. For example, what is the point of a for profit website getting a lot of internet traffic if the visitors have a low sales conversion rate due to the website being perceived as a low credibility website?
863
edits

Navigation menu