Search results

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|27|8|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 27:8 |

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Matthew|8|27|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Matthew 8:27 |

(There is a note at the Discussion page regarding the use here of wikisource Bible refs.) .../en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/1_Corinthians#8:6 1 Corinthians 8:6];

[[Job 8|8]] [[Job 27|27]]

G'day Matthew. Welcome. Thanks for your email. I think the technology pages you suggested ...ward to seeing them eventually grow. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham]] 13:12, 27 July 2009 (PDT)

...d the subsequent implications of that design, is a subject inherent to any discussion about the Christian faith. The church, in its broadest application, is a co ...ever defined, is a component of the comprehensive Christian belief and any discussion of it in the Bible cannot be separated from the whole.

...ed in the one phrase, “of a wife the husband is a head;” and we waived the discussion of this symbolism until the present time. As we have already said, the only ...ll the world ". . . preach . . . teach . . . baptize." (See Luke, Mark and Matthew). Men and women listened to the command; women tarried and got the power as

...,5; Heb. 2:10,11,14,15); be under the Law (Ps. 40:8; Gal. 4:4,5; Phil. 2:5-8); and to bear the sins of His people (Isaiah 53:12; John 10:11,15; 1 Pet. 2 ...1 Cor. 7:37; Rom. 6:17; Deut. 29:4). From the heart man understands (Prov. 8:5), reflects (Luke 2:19), feels joy (Isa. 65:14), and experiences pain (Pro

...I love John's theology, although his discourses are somewhat repetitious. Matthew, Mark and Luke are open source, you can discuss Alpha and Omega till Kingdo ...suggested, underline "believers" and leave your comment in the temporary (Discussion Start) section for the record. Even more fitting, it would be from the Aval

...bert. I've just had some friends drop over so I'll be out of action on any discussion for a couple hours. But I'm thinking that a clear picture has emerged. So f ...alk page for the link. Thanks. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 11:52, 8 August 2008 (PDT)

...ristian wiki has a lot of potential. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 22:15, 8 Mar 2005 (PST) ...ote a single style for the titles. --[[User:Mustaphile|Mustaphile]] 11:06, 8 May 2005 (PDT)

...at occur when you move a page. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 12:14, 8 October 2008 (PDT) ...chnical problems with WikiChristian. And brilliant work getting rid of the Matthew Henry Commentary pages! --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 10:26, 10 Octo

...ounce of sanity ever made the lofty claims He did. He accepted worship ([[Matthew 14:33]], [[John 20:28]]), and claimed the right to (as a third party) forgi ...aims to be. Helping you decide He indeed is the Eternal Son of God ([[John 8:58]]) is what this essay is all about. The following THREE ARGUMENTS, now t

8: Martin Luther’s Opinion Of The Book Of Jude: A paragraph-by-paragraph an If you’ve ever entered into a discussion on the canon of Scripture, the issue of Luther’s view inevitably comes up