Difference between revisions of "Historical accuracy of the Bible"
(Category:Bible) |
(Add link to Historicity of the New Testament (theopedia)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
topic_name = The Historical Accuracy of the Bible| | topic_name = The Historical Accuracy of the Bible| | ||
subtopics = [[Biblical inerrancy]], [[Biblical infallibility]] | subtopics = [[Biblical inerrancy]], [[Biblical infallibility]] | ||
| − | * [[Historical evidence of Jesus Christ]] | | + | * [[Historical evidence of Jesus Christ]] |
| + | * [[Historicity of the New Testament (theopedia)]] | | ||
opinion_pieces = {{short_opinions}} | | opinion_pieces = {{short_opinions}} | | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 27 November 2009
| The Historical Accuracy of the Bible | |
| RELATED TOPICS | |
| SERMONS, ESSAYS AND OPINIONS |
|
| CONTENTS | |
Is the Bible historically accurate? This is a question that sparks great debate. Most evangelical and conservative Christians believe in Biblical inerrancy - indeed, the apostle Paul wrote in 2 Timothy that all scripture is God-breathed. Belief in biblical inerrancy implies that the Bible is completely accurate - however, sometimes the Bible speaks in poetry or with parables - and although great truths are found in these parts, they do not necessarily speak of history. When the Bible does speak of kings and wars and prophets, its accuracy is often backed up by other historical documents and most Christians believe the Bible is historically accurate.
This article is a stub. You can help WikiChristian by expanding it. For help please read the WikiChristian Tutorial and our writing guide.
Quotes
Links
Return to Christianity -> Bible -> Interpreting the Bible
