Difference between revisions of "Historical understandings of Genesis"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | {{Infobox_Contents | |
| + | topic_name = Historical Understandings of Genesis | | ||
| + | subtopics = [[Creation]], [[Eden]], [[Adam]], [[Eve]], [[The Fall]], [[Babel]], [[Noah]], [[The Flood]] | ||
| + | * [[Genre]] | ||
| + | * [[Creation science, intelligent design and evolution]] | | ||
| + | opinion_pieces = {{short_opinions}} | | ||
| + | }} | ||
| − | There is some disagreement among Christians regarding the historical nature of the book. Questions naturally arise such as: "Was there a garden?" | + | There is some disagreement among Christians regarding the historical nature of the book. Questions naturally arise such as: "Was there a garden?", "Was their a fall with the serpent?", "Was there a world-wide flood, or a local flood?", "Was there really a tower of Babel?". Disagreement arise partly because of the way in which the book is read, in particular, which genre the reader feels most appropriately fits the book. Some Christians, especially in the Developing World and the United States, read the book as literal history, and thus understand the world to be around 8,000 years old. They see all of the Creation story to be factually accurate. At the other end of the spectrum, other Christians see the genre, at least of the first few chapters of Genesis, in a more parabolic or metaphorical way. These Christians do not necessarily believe in a literal Adam or Eve, but see the creation story as making a number of points, including God as creator, with humans rebelling against their creator. |
| − | == | + | ==Quotes== |
| − | + | ==Links== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | {{ | + | {{returnto}} [[Genesis]] | [[Creation]] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | {{stub}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | {{ | ||
Revision as of 09:06, 19 January 2008
| Historical Understandings of Genesis | |
| RELATED TOPICS | |
| SERMONS, ESSAYS AND OPINIONS |
|
| CONTENTS | |
There is some disagreement among Christians regarding the historical nature of the book. Questions naturally arise such as: "Was there a garden?", "Was their a fall with the serpent?", "Was there a world-wide flood, or a local flood?", "Was there really a tower of Babel?". Disagreement arise partly because of the way in which the book is read, in particular, which genre the reader feels most appropriately fits the book. Some Christians, especially in the Developing World and the United States, read the book as literal history, and thus understand the world to be around 8,000 years old. They see all of the Creation story to be factually accurate. At the other end of the spectrum, other Christians see the genre, at least of the first few chapters of Genesis, in a more parabolic or metaphorical way. These Christians do not necessarily believe in a literal Adam or Eve, but see the creation story as making a number of points, including God as creator, with humans rebelling against their creator.
Quotes
Links
This article is a stub. You can help WikiChristian by expanding it. For help please read the WikiChristian Tutorial and our writing guide.
