Search results

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Luke|23|16|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Luke 23:16 |

{{Quote|text=<big>{{Bible verse|Luke|16|23|lang=WEB}}</big>}} topic_name = Luke 16:23 |

(There is a note at the Discussion page regarding the use here of wikisource Bible verses.) [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Ezekiel#8:16 Ezekiel 8:16-18];

...n is repeated whenever a new point is taken up. . . . Under each heading a discussion is given as has been desired, and therefore the matters are discussed one a ...quotations from the letter from Corinth, using each as a "heading" to his discussion of the points involved, but it is unnecessary. We merely wish to show that

...ort of His church, and binds its members together into one (Ephesians 4:15-16; Colossians 2:19). ...ce where it is stated that the husband is head of the wife, is Ephesians 5:23, and there we are told in what sense he is head,--as Christ also is Head o

subtopics = [[Matthew 26]], [[Mark 16]], [[Luke 24]], [[John 20]]-[[John 21|21]]| ! Luke

...ology, although his discourses are somewhat repetitious. Matthew, Mark and Luke are open source, you can discuss Alpha and Omega till Kingdom come and, wal ...maybe I won't publish at all. I have to contact the initiator of [[John 20:16]] and get his thoughts about Wikibook possibilities. [[User:Athrash|Athrash

..., and David (Sam. 7:12-16), etc., and in the NT there is the New Covenant (Luke 22:20; Matt. 26:28; Heb. 7:22) that was prophesied in Jer. 31:31-37. In the Eternal Covenant, the Father would prepare the Son a body (Luke 1:35; Heb. 10:5); give the Son the Spirit without measure (Is. 43:1,2; 61:1

...great thing by devoting so much of your time to this project! ---- 09:07, 23 Apr 2005 (PDT) ...hat will be "preachy" but hopefully at least it will be open for dialogue, discussion and rebuttal. I also don't think making this a purely factual Encyclopedia

...e way, have you seen: [[WikiChristian:Beliefs]]? --[[User:Muser|Muser]] 15:16, 6 November 2007 (EST) ...- [[User:P.B. Pilhet|P.B. Pilhet]] / [[User talk:P.B. Pilhet|Talk]] 19:13, 16 April 2008 (PDT)

...niverse in His heavenly pre-existence ([[John 1]]:1-3,14, [[Colossians 1]]:16, and [[Hebrews]] 1:2). In summary, the claim of the New Testament is that J ...ng the accuracy of the Biblical texts. Sir William Ramsey’s vindication of Luke’s writings is a classic example.9 The findings of archaeology have in fac

...ill come to you: for I trust to see you in my journey.” (Rom. 15:19-20, 22-23) From this passage, therefore, we clearly see that St. Paul had no knowledg ...divine and holy Fathers (p. 3, 1.14-18; p. 4, 1.19; p. 9, 1.6; and pp. 17, 23), he manifestly calumniates them and us their successors and descendants: t

Appendix B: Luther’s Sermon on James: An entire sermon by Luther from James 1:16-21 – “Two things there are which part men from the Gospel: one is angry If you’ve ever entered into a discussion on the canon of Scripture, the issue of Luther’s view inevitably comes up