Talk:An overview of the English Standard Version of the Bible

I'd recommend the "adapted from Theopedia" be removed from the title and instead inserted at the bottom of the article. Or perhaps make a template for articles adapted from Theopedia. Articles on Theopedia are under the FDL, much like articles on Wikichristian. I think that having the "adapted" part in the title sometimes discourages future contributors from changes portions of it. We obviously want to give credit, but I'm not sure the title is the best place for it. Anyone agree or disagree with me? Cpark 23:52, 11 Oct 2005 (EDT)

Absolutely. I agree. Rename the file

I moved it again to remove Theopedia completely from the title. I'll add an "adapted from theopedia" notice at the bottom of the page. My thinking is this is how we should do all theopedia and wikipedia articles. My logic is that once we copy and paste, we have forked the article, and therefore we are going to take it in a different direction then theopedia or wikipedia would, hence it becomes distinctly ours. Cpark 20:16, 12 Oct 2005 (EDT)