392
edits
Changes
→Strength in numbers: reply
{| class="infobox" width= Combining our efforts? ="315px"|-! align="center" | Archives----|-|# [[Talk:Christian wikis/Archive 1]]# [[Talk:Christian wikis/Archive 2]]|}
:Theopedia contacted CARMpedia (when Of course you may. Good luck with it began) about combining efforts since there seemed to be considerable commonality in perspective. There was no interest from CARMpedia in doing so at that time. Theopedia has a significant amount of content and invites participation -- however, a preference for the Protestant (Reformed) perspective will likely keep Theopedia as a separate wiki. Respectfully, ''Gomarus at Theopedia'', [[User:65.168.235.36Graham grove|65.168.235.36Graham grove]] 2000:4419, 2 Jan 2006 17 July 2008 (ESTPDT)
::Good pointThx. A way around that however I thought it would be polite to have wiki that can cover all view points, however individual articles within ask before since it could be specific to a particular perspective - for example, you could write an article is my first edit on '''Salvation (Reformed view)''' under the main article [[Salvation]]this wiki. --[[User:203.26.206.130Benedikt|203.26.206.130Benedikt]] 0611:5532, 18 February 2006 17 July 2008 (ESTPDT)
:One : Pity. Still wikipedia seems to draw in a lot of the problems I see with interlinking between different wikis, is that once you link out of a wiki (say WikiChrisitan into Wikible) then all the new links are in the new wiki (Wikible in this case, people who edit and not WikiChristian)work on articles. How does Google Adwords work? Does it cost money? --[[User:203.26.206.130Graham grove|203.26.206.130Graham]] 06:5212, 18 February 2006 October 2008 (ESTPDT)
::I'm not sure I completely follow : 5 USD up front. Then youset a monthly budget (suggested min. The whole point would be 50 USD) and they limit your placement so as to have different wikis interlinkedshoot below that. You pick keywords for pages and searches and track how many are displayed and/or clicked on. This is a Starter Account, which forces you to pick '''one''' country to display in. WikiChristian could link to Theopedia and Wikible ::: As for exampleWikipedia, as the Christian point-of-view become more and Theopedia and Wikible could link back to WikiChristianmore marginalized, perhaps Christians will begin looking for something better... --[[User:YmmotrojamAquatiki|YmmotrojamAquatiki]] 0917:4726, 19 February 2006 18 October 2008 (ESTPDT)
:Just to add to the aboveGod bless you. In my humble opinion, using public domain or CC (only attribution) allows more solidarity since the GNU/FDL allows content to texts can be copied from other Wikis with used anywhere. For example I cannot copy the same licensetexts of WikiChristian, ReformedWord, OrthodoxWiki, CreationWiki neiter Conservapedia in fe. It pasosdeJesus.org --just beginning. However I could copy and I would be a violation prefer to contribute with Theopedia (public domain). You also could use the translation to spanish of the GNUgospels in the public domain (I'm working on that and I pray to God for direction and His help): http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12501 http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12500 http://www.gutenberg.org/FDL to copy from etext/12502 http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12503 Vladimir Támara. 07:56 COT Jan 3 2009 :: I don't understand. First you say PD and CC are good and then you say WikipediaWikiChristian,Reformed Word, to a Orthodox Wiki that had no license or a different one.aren't great, when they are GFDL and CC (SA-A) respectively. Which is it? Do you mean only PD is good? You can copy stuff as long you footnote it. --[[User:YmmotrojamAquatiki|YmmotrojamAquatiki]] 0105:1813, 3 Jan 2006 4 January 2009 (ESTPST) ==See also==[[Talk:Christian wikis/discussion]]