392
edits
Changes
→Strength in numbers: reply
{| class="infobox" width= Combining our efforts? ="315px"|-! align="center" | Archives----|-|# [[Talk:Christian wikis/Archive 1]]# [[Talk:Christian wikis/Archive 2]]|}
:Theopedia contacted CARMpedia (when Of course you may. Good luck with it began) about combining efforts since there seemed to be considerable commonality in perspective. There was no interest from CARMpedia in doing so at that time. Theopedia has a significant amount of content and invites participation -- however, a preference for the Protestant (Reformed) perspective will likely keep Theopedia as a separate wiki. Respectfully, ''Gomarus at Theopedia'', [[User:65.168.235.36Graham grove|65.168.235.36Graham grove]] 2000:4419, 2 Jan 2006 17 July 2008 (ESTPDT)
:I've recently added Google Adword for ReformedWord.org I think the kinds of people who would use these wiki once they're very good are legion, but the people who want to edit and work on them is much smaller. --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 04:26, 18 October 2008 (PDT) :Just : Pity. Still wikipedia seems to add draw in a lot of people who edit and work on articles. How does Google Adwords work? Does it cost money? --[[User:Graham grove|Graham]] 06:12, 18 October 2008 (PDT) ::: 5 USD up front. Then you set a monthly budget (suggested min. 50 USD) and they limit your placement so as to shoot below that. You pick keywords for pages and searches and track how many are displayed and/or clicked on. This is a Starter Account, which forces you to pick '''one''' country to display in.::: As for Wikipedia, as the aboveChristian point-of-view become more and more marginalized, perhaps Christians will begin looking for something better... --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 17:26, using 18 October 2008 (PDT) :::Well all I'm from a new bible wiki of sort, [[BibleFootnotes]]. And I'd like to add a couple thoughts here about combining our efforts. I've been following the GNU/FDL allows content biblewiki world for a while seeing the difficulty and division that has been there. Perhaps one way that we can all work together is to be copied from other Wikis with each find different areas that we can focus on so that we're not all doing the same licensething. It would Several wikis seem to be bible commentary. We think we might have made some progress in how to make a collaborative commentary a violation little more usable and would love for all of you to check it out and give us your feedback. We think some of the GNU/FDL reason that bible commentary wikis haven't caught on is that they're too difficult to use. We've tried to do a little something different. If you like what you see, each of these Christian wikis could start specializing into different projects. Thoughts?::: : God bless you. In my humble opinion, public domain or CC (only attribution) allows more solidarity since the texts can be used anywhere. For example I cannot copy from say Wikipediathe texts of WikiChristian, ReformedWord, OrthodoxWiki, CreationWiki neiter Conservapedia in fe.pasosdeJesus.org --just beginning. However I could copy and I would prefer to contribute with Theopedia (public domain). You also could use the translation to a Wiki spanish of the gospels in the public domain (I'm working on that had no license or a different oneand I pray to God for direction and His help): http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12501 http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12500 http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12502 http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/12503 Vladimir Támara.07:56 COT Jan 3 2009 :: I don't understand. First you say PD and CC are good and then you say WikiChristian,Reformed Word, Orthodox Wiki aren't great, when they are GFDL and CC (SA-A) respectively. Which is it? Do you mean only PD is good? You can copy stuff as long you footnote it. --[[User:YmmotrojamAquatiki|YmmotrojamAquatiki]] 0105:1813, 3 Jan 2006 4 January 2009 (ESTPST) ==See also==[[Talk:Christian wikis/discussion]]