936
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
tweaked, added comment
:Now I know this comes with time, but even so it is needed. No body wants to read a so-called 'encyclopedia' that looks like it was formatted and designed by children. One of the reasons, I think, Theopedia has done so well is because it does have a professional feel to it. It's not necessarily the most technologically advanced or active, but I think it has a respect because of the way it looks and the standards they have developed. Other wikis, including Wikible are still behind in that area.
:'''Planning before implementing...'''
:This is huge. It's great to have a wiki full of content, but if for example, you don't plan ahead of time what kinds of categories, semantic relations, and a general system for implementation, everything goes crazy. Then it is such a hard/huge task later that nobody wants to do it and they claim that it is 'good enough the way it is.' It's like neglecting homework. That is one of the main reasons that Wikible is a little slower on content, because we're trying to get the proper technology and organization sorted out, so newcomers can easily add content very easily and efficiently.
:--[[User:Ymmotrojam|Tom]] 11:04, 15 November 2006 (EST)
:'''Being aware of other wikis...'''
:I think it's also important to learn from other wikis. I think if we are to be effective in organizing the wiki, we can't just rely on our own organizational skills to get us through. Many of the things on Wikible are adaptations/improvements of ideas from other wikis. Isolating oneself does not really help.
:--[[User:Ymmotrojam|Tom]] 11:10, 15 November 2006 (EST)
{{returnto}} [[Christian wikis]]
