Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holy See"

From WikiChristian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
 
Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- [[User:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">Ryan†Cross</font>]] ('''''[[User talk:RyanCross|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
  
: Good point. Not only that, this appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (albeit an old one from 2006 - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holy_See&oldid=53755324]). Also it doesn't seem to fit in with the [[WikiChristian:Page Layour|Writing guide]] which states that: "In general, Information Articles should be written in a manner that makes them clear and easy to understand.". As such I think a complete restart to this article would be worthwhile. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:23, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
+
: Good point. Not only that, this appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (albeit an old one from 2006 - [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holy_See&oldid=53755324]). Also it doesn't seem to fit in with the [[WikiChristian:Page Layout|Writing Guide]] which states that: "In general, Information Articles should be written in a manner that makes them clear and easy to understand.". As such I think a complete restart to this article would be worthwhile. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:23, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
 +
: I have taken the liberty to restart the article. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:31, 16 August 2008 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 16:31, 16 August 2008

Too many red links

Hi there. This article has too many red links... anyone want to help create them? Thanks! -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 05:34, 16 August 2008 (PDT)

Good point. Not only that, this appears to be a direct copy of the wikipedia article (albeit an old one from 2006 - [1]). Also it doesn't seem to fit in with the Writing Guide which states that: "In general, Information Articles should be written in a manner that makes them clear and easy to understand.". As such I think a complete restart to this article would be worthwhile. --Graham grove 09:23, 16 August 2008 (PDT)
I have taken the liberty to restart the article. --Graham grove 09:31, 16 August 2008 (PDT)