User:Theologian/workarea2

In addition, Conservapedia has an extremely negative view of atheism.^[1]

In his essay rebutting a work of atheist Jeffery Jay Lowder Christian apologist JP Holding wrote the following: "...I find that there is no such thing as "reasonable nonbelief." The litany of excuses, wild speculations, and other absurdities ground out by skeptics and critics doesn't deserve the adjective "reasonable"."^[2]

Why don't you make the Wikipedia atheism article more realistic and have it contain some of the negative aspects of atheism like Conservapedia does. [1] Currently, this article is very biased/POV.

http://ravingatheists.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14346

http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/19/the-official-fdl-election-season-guide-to-the-left-wing-traitorsphere/#comments

http://atheistrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/04/when-christians-want-you-dead.html

http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2008/01/15/lion-feed-main-course-conservatipedia/#comments

http://atheism.about.com/b/2008/04/17/godless-moral-values-can-godless-atheists-have-moral-values.htm

http://splendidelles.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/expelled-no-theistic-evolution-allowed/#comments

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5094#56381

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Atheism

http://www.atheists.org/nogodblog/index.php/2008/04/06/still_waiting#c87484

http://www.atheismonline.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17&start=15

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/religion_theseeker/2008/04/pope-benedict-s.html

http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/04/rep-monique-dav.html?cid=111401156#comments