Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:Aquatiki

502 bytes added, 22:31, 2 November 2008
Howdy: sources
:::::: That's a fascinating story. I can't believe a doctor got in trouble for that. Fortunately that would currently be impossible over here because doctors aren't under any obligation to be involved in any procedure or treatment that they consider immoral. Still, US states have a legal system based in English common law don't they? Thus if it's possible in California, then its' probably possible in South Australia I fear. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham]] 08:55, 2 November 2008 (PST)
 
::::::: [http://www.nationalpartnership.org/site/News2?abbr=daily2_&page=NewsArticle&id=11463&security=1201&news_iv_ctrl=-1], [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,359041,00.html], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Coast_Women%27s_Care_Medical_Group_v._Superior_Court] '''North Coast Women's Care Medical Group vs. Superior Court''' is a case decided before the California Supreme Court on August 19, 2008, ruling that physicians must offer services to gays and lesbians despite religious objections

Navigation menu