administrator, Bureaucrats, bureaucrats, checkuser, editor, emailconfirmed, move, Administrators
122,009
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Bot Halt
: Thanks Robert for keeping a watch on him. What's next on the agenda. Delete the New Testament WEB pages and WEB templates and overwrite the New Testament pages with redirects to the Bible namespace? Or upload the Greek and Hebrew Old Testament and Apocrypha? Oh, by the way, I'm fiddling with ideas for how to do the chapter pages. What are your thoughts and ideas for the chapter pages. Also, do you think the chapter pgaes are best in the Bible namespace or the main namespace? I'm thinking that they might be best in the main namespace. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 13:32, 29 August 2008 (PDT)
:: I was gonna finish all my uploading first, so that the pages we make look their best first. As for the chapters, how much material are they supposed to have on them? Seems to me like they will be as spartan as the verse pages until people take a special interest in editing one of them. I think this is 3500 hundred pages that'll clog up the main namespace, but you decide. Can you point me to a good example one of these for me to pattern after? --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 13:36, 29 August 2008 (PDT)
::: I'm not hugely fussed either way. In the main namespace there's two advantages - people will come across them with the "random page" function and so may add something; also you don't get a chapter when you click "random verse" if they are in the main namespace. The disadvantage, like you say, is 3500 empty pages that will come up on clicking "random page".
:::: Some examples of the chapter pages are: [[Backup:John 11]], [[Backup:Matthew 16]], [[Backup:Genesis 1]], [[Backup:Mark 1]], [[Backup:Luke 15]] and [[Backup:Luke 10]]. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 13:52, 29 August 2008 (PDT)
