administrator, Bureaucrats, bureaucrats, checkuser, editor, emailconfirmed, move, Administrators
122,009
edits
Changes
no edit summary
* I don't disagree that sometimes it's plain as day, but just to take you last one as an example: Dispensationalism says that Ancient Israel '''''is''''' Modern Israel: you're deciding they are not by having two pages and linking to one over the other. Or, somewhere you and I might disagree, what is "the world" in [[John 3:16]]? The planet? The people? Which people? The elect? Who gets to decide which link is appropriate when there isn't just one page to which one can link?
* Footnotes about textual variations are so erudite and esoteric, that I can't imagine any but the most lofty of scholars wanting to input that resolution of detail into a wiki. Since, however, [http://unbound.biola.edu Unbound]'s free texts provide it, it would seem best in by judgment to include it on the Greek page and nowhere else. --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 11:01, 23 July 2008 (PDT)
::::: Graham
* Fair enough - I'm happy to cut out the idea of putting links in the English text. I guess the commentary section is meant for the explaining of terms anyway. I still think it is important to put the links in the original language however.
* I agree about leaving textual variations in the Greek page.
::::: It seems to me that we're coming to some good conclusions here. I don't imagine that many other people are going to make comments, but you never know.
::::: I think the next step is to work out what a standard page verse, chapter and book page would look like. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 11:10, 23 July 2008 (PDT)