administrator, Bureaucrats, bureaucrats, editor, emailconfirmed, Administrators
11,529
edits
Changes
Category:WikiChristian
:::: Well-flushed-out adjectives and verbs might look a little gross, but names and nouns might not look too bad. I tend to agree with you, however. Shall we make it a definitive statement? --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 09:13, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
::::: Yep. Agreed. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 09:16, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
== Current system ==
I really like the way John 1:1 is looking. Although it may not be as fancy as ReformedWord I actually like this simpler system. Well done. Looking good. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 07:48, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
: With your approval, I think it's about time to try a mass-production. How 'bout ... the gospel of John? This would involve the change/creation-of any ''John_???:???'' pages into/as redirects, the creation of all Bible/Greek/Hebrew/Latin/KJV/WEB:John_???:??? pages and the deletion of all ''Template'' and ''John ... (WEB)'' pages.
: Are we ready? --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 10:06, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:: We're definitely ready.
:: Note that: [[John 11]], [[John 11:25]] and [[John 11:35]] have a commentary section that would be good not to lose. Should we copy these pages into the discussion on this page?
:: For the chapter pages, e.g. John 1, I think it would be good to use the exact same style as for the verse page except for the following: instead of the whole chapter quoted at the top, perhaps just display the first verse quoted in a collapsed box that is expandable.
:: I'm looking forward to a fully functioning Gospel of John! --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:31, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
::: <small>I'll take your points in reverse order</small> I not gonna try the chapter page at this time. Let me make a mock up at [[Bible:John 1]] first before we try.
::: What about those commentary pages? Should they be at [[John 1:1 (commentary)]] or [[Bible:John 1:1 (commentary)]] with a redirect? --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 14:37, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
== Collapsibility ==
For some reason the table of different translations doesn't seem collapsible on my computer here. I'm not sure if it is a problem at my end or at the servers end. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:35, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
: What browser are you using? Trying clearing your cache. Does it work in Firefox? --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 14:37, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:: I've tried both firefox 2 and internet explorer 5. I'll clear my cache though and see what happens. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:38, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:: Clearing the cache hasn't seemed to have made a difference. I can see all the verses - the box simply appears to be permanently expanded on mine with no link to expand or hide. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:40, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:: When I use internet explorer, the page appears to load up fine, but down the bottom (where it says "Done" it notes that there was an error loading the page). --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:41, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
::: What on EARTH?!?!?!? That was working a minute ago!?!?! This is so frustrating. :-( I wanna cry! --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 14:45, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:::: I thought I saw it working too and wondered if I was going mad! What I reckon is lets not worry about collapsibility for the moment. That can also be added in later right? --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:49, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
::::: I '''''WILL''''' get it working again! The trouble is, changes takes ''days'' to filter through. There are internal caches and caches across the internet and browser caches. It WILL work, but like you said, I won't worry for now. --[[User:Aquatiki|Aquatiki]] 14:53, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
:::::: I like your attitude. Definitely not worth stressing over at the moment. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 14:56, 2 August 2008 (PDT)
[[Category:WikiChristian]]