Difference between revisions of "Talk:Other religions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Graham grove (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
the name of this page is insulting. "cults" should be considered separately from "other religions" that happen to be non-christian. unbelievable. | the name of this page is insulting. "cults" should be considered separately from "other religions" that happen to be non-christian. unbelievable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why is it insulting? The page refers to both, "other religions" and also to "cults". It is not assuming that are necessarily the same thing; it just seemed to make sense to group them together because they other religions such as Buddhism, as well as cults such as the Closed Brethren, are both non-Christian belief systems. --[[User:Graham grove|Graham grove]] 15:09, 6 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 6 February 2007
the name of this page is insulting. "cults" should be considered separately from "other religions" that happen to be non-christian. unbelievable.
Why is it insulting? The page refers to both, "other religions" and also to "cults". It is not assuming that are necessarily the same thing; it just seemed to make sense to group them together because they other religions such as Buddhism, as well as cults such as the Closed Brethren, are both non-Christian belief systems. --Graham grove 15:09, 6 February 2007 (EST)
