Changes

The Qur'an rejects the idea that Jesus is the physical son, ''walad,'' , of God but not that he is the spiritual Son of God , which is what Christians believe or what the Bible says. Therefore the Qur'an is not critiquing criticising Christianity; it is either rebuking Christian heretics or misunderstanding what Christianity really teaches. There is no contradiction for a Muslim to call Jesus the Son of God as the Bible does.

Walad is Arabic for son, always meaning a physical son. When the Qur'an says Jesus is not the Son of God, it uses walad in ever every case but one.

Ibn is Arabic for son and can carry the conotation connotation of either a physical son or a figurative son. For example, an adopted son would be an ibn, not a walad. The Qur'an calls travelers travellers "sons of the road" (Surah 2.215). If the Qur'an were truly correcting the Bible, it would use this word. However, only one verse uses ibn to speak of Jesus. Arabic is closely connected with Hebrew, in which ibn correlates with ''ben''. Ben also means either physical or figurative son. 

''The Jews call 'Uzair a son (ibn) of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son (ibn) of Allah. (9.30)''

However, this This does not mean , however, that Jesus is not the ''figurative '' Son of God because the Qur'an might be appealing to the physical meaning of ibn. Based on the numerous other references, this is most likely, though not completely certain. It may have been that the Qur'an was rebuking calling those who call Ezra the ibn of God, either physical or figurative, and used ibn for Jesus also for the purely literary connection. In either case, it cannot be proven that this verse denies the figurative sonship of Jesus.

Some translations mistakenly call Jesus "begotten" by God. This but this is a mistranslation.